Saturday, 2 June 2012

Secular Café: What is God's aim?

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
What is God's aim?
Jun 2nd 2012, 09:47

A Jehovah's witness chapped my door today and asked me whether I knew what God's aim was.

A few sentences of firm but courteous interchange left her in no doubt that I was one of the Unsaved, but I was entertained by the answer my son came up with:-

Quote:

He can strike an atheist from the other end of the galaxy.
So what one-liners would other folk have provided?

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, 1 June 2012

Secular Café: Richard Carrier on Jesus Mythicism

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
Richard Carrier on Jesus Mythicism
Jun 2nd 2012, 03:21

Richard Carrier's recent talk at a freethought conference (MP3), courtesy of Toto at FRDB in this thread.

It's very interesting. He contrasts three sorts of theories:
  • Traditional Xian one: Jesus Christ was a superhuman god-human hybrid who worked lots of miracles.
  • Secular historical-Jesus position: JC was 100% human with 100% human parentage, an obscure religious prophet who got executed by the authorities.
  • Jesus mythicism: there was no earthly JC. Instead, he was a sort-of god who got reinterpreted as having had an earthly existence.

He argues that Xianity fits Hellenistic religious trends very well:
  • Syncretism, especially cross-cultural syncretism. Very common.
  • Monotheism, though usually with the form of a big god and a lot of little deities. Can anyone say angels and saints?
  • Individual salvation. Dying and rising gods were originally in agricultural cults about the death and resurrection of the vegetation, but they came to emphasize individual death and resurrection.
  • Cosmopolitanism. One isn't born into it, but instead chooses it, and one's fellow followers become one's honorary brothers and sisters.

Jews had been reluctant to go along with it, but by the beginning of the Common Era, some Jews had done some Hellenistic-Jewish syncretism. Xianity then emerged from it.

RC then gets into dying and rising gods, and as he so correctly says, Mithras was NOT one of them. However, he went through some ordeal or other that involved the killing of a bull. You can see carvings of Mithras cutting a bull's throat in some surviving Mithraism sanctuaries.

RC discussed our first source about Jesus Christ, Paul's letters. Paul talked mostly about a heavenly JC who was a demigod, one who was only known through revelation and Old Testament texts, and not from some earthly existence.

He also mentioned Philo talking about a similar sort of demigod, though I'd like to see sources about that.

As to reinterpreting deities as human, that was very common in the Greco-Roman world. It's called euhemerism, after someone named Euhemerus who did a lot of that. He interpreted Zeus as an earthly king, and I'd guess that he was memorable for being a ladies' man.

RC also mentions the Roswell incident, and how over 30 years some fragments of a high-altitude balloon experiment got exaggerated into the recovery of a flying saucer and autopsies of its operators.

On the subject of mythmaking, one could add how the Rastafarians turned Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie into a messiah figure.

RC also mentioned the origins of Islam and Mormonism from prophets who claim to have had revelations. Such prophets could be having hallucinations, and given my numerous experiences of waking dreams, I would not be surprised if many people conclude that they had been journeying in some other realm. Of course, there are cases of fakery, and that's rather evident for Joseph Smith.

Looking back in antiquity, our only source for a certain Alexander of Abonutichus, Lucian of Samosata, makes him seem like an outright charlatan.

RC recommended three books:
  • Earl Doherty, The Jesus Puzzle, which he prefers to ED's second book as more concise.
  • Robert Price, The Christ-Myth Theory and Its Problems.
  • Randel Helms, Gospel Fictions, arguing that much of the Gospels' content is pure fiction.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: God to Jesus. I just condemned the human race. Now go die to save them.

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
God to Jesus. I just condemned the human race. Now go die to save them.
Jun 2nd 2012, 00:03

God to Jesus. I just condemned the human race. Now go die to save them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoHP-f-_F9U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ott1...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqP_f...eature=related

I think that the notion that punishing the innocent instead of the guilty perpetrator is immoral. Be it a willing sacrifice as some believe with Jesus or unwilling victim.

I also think that God, who has a plethora of other options, would have come up with a moral way instead of an immoral and barbaric human sacrifice.

I agree with scriptures say that we are all responsible for our own righteousness as well as our own iniquity and that God cannot be bribed by sacrifice.

Ezekiel 18:20
The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Psalm 49:7
None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:

I believe as I do because I believe that the first rule of morality is harm/care of children.

http://blog.ted.com/2008/09/17/the_real_differ/

Do you agree that the notion of substitutionary atonement is immoral and that God's first principle of morality is hare/harm and that this would prevent him from demanding the death of his son?

Regards
DL

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: Living Headstones

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
Living Headstones
Jun 1st 2012, 09:43

Have a QR code etched into your gravestone and live forever!

Quote:

While technology has allowed for more mobility, it has also increased the separation of families worldwide. What hasn't changed is our desire to keep memories of loved ones alive for future generations.

Quiring has created a new type of headstone which connects families regardless of where they live. Our Living Headstones® memorial blends the timeless tradition of granite headstones with the newest technology available. We provide an interactive "living" memorial that is a legacy for future generations.

Living Headstones® have been featured in some of the country's top news sources including NPR, ABC News, USA Today, FOX Business, The Seattle Times, and others.

How Does it Work?

Similar to a personal Facebook page, a Living Headstones® archive website contains information you and friends add about your loved one, such as: an obituary, family heritage and history, photos, comments by friends and relatives and even links to share content on popular social sites such as Facebook or Twitter.

....
http://www.monuments.com/living-headstones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, 31 May 2012

Secular Café: Moldy Jesus

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
Moldy Jesus
May 31st 2012, 23:26

Yes, he's come to save the shower fungi and bacteria, too!

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?se...378&hpt=us_bn8

In Texas, where else?

What next, I wonder? Poison Ivy Jesus, displayed in a pattern of red pustules on someone's arm?

Or wait. I know.

BM Jesus.

But I for one do *not* want to see the pictures.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Secular Café: "In God We Teach"

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
"In God We Teach"
May 31st 2012, 15:12

This is a documentary a friend of mine made. If you like it, please share/like/poke/fold/spindle/mutilate:

(Not loaded: wP6B4gpgyRI)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Secular Café: No charges on 'racist' King's Torah text

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
No charges on 'racist' King's Torah text
May 30th 2012, 11:45

Quote:

Israel's Attorney General has decided not to prosecute two rabbis who wrote a controversial religious text proposing circumstances in which it is permissible to kill non-Jews even if they pose no direct physical threat of violence.

Yehuda Weinstein said remarks in the text, known as the "King's Torah", were "deserving of condemnation and denunciation", but also added that an investigation had failed to produce enough evidence to justify an indictment for incitement.

Critics of the text, whose religious Zionist authors come from the notably hardline West Bank settlement of Yitzhar, argue it is racist and could be read as sanctioning the murder of Arabs.

According to advertisements denouncing the text, published last year by Brit Hoshech Legaresh, a broad organisation of Israeli Orthodox, Reform, Conservative and secular Jews, it suggested "every place the presence of a non-Jew endangers a Jewish life it is permitted to kill him even if he is one of the righteous among gentiles and bears no guilt for the situation that has been created." It also reportedly says killing children would be permissible if they are being raised with the objective of harming Jews, to prevent them growing up as enemies.

cont...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...t-7800937.html


My bold.

I'm wondering if these guys are completely rouge or representative of their local community in these views...

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions