Secular Café | Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture. | |
Good defense of Dawkins by Camels With Hammers Apr 6th 2012, 07:03 Which puts his call to mock and ridicule in context http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswi...-rally-speech/ Quote: First of all, these criticisms of Dawkins lazily and unreasonably ignore the actual rationale that he gave for specifically raising the issue of transubstantiation. It was actually not to make the believer feel stupid for believing such nonsense. Dawkins explicitly expressed doubt that the majority of nominally believing people really do believe such absurdities. He did not impugn their intelligence but rather he actually assumed they were smarter than their supposed beliefs. He was calling atheists to challenge nominal Catholics to confront the dissonance between what they actually believe and the Catholicism they often only passively belong to. | David | |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.