Wednesday, 6 June 2012

Secular Café: Legendary Fail: People are on Welfare Because They Don't Read the Bible

Secular Café
Discuss atheism, religious apologetics, separation of church & state, theology, comparative religion and scripture.
Legendary Fail: People are on Welfare Because They Don't Read the Bible
Jun 7th 2012, 03:09

link


Quote:

People are on welfare for many different reasons. Most people are on welfare because they lost their jobs and need benefits to care for their families until they can find new work. Others are sick or disabled and are therefore unable to work. These are reasonable explanations for why people need welfare. But religious conservatives are inventing a new reason to explain why people are on welfare.

According to right-wing preacher and activist David Barton, people are on welfare because they don’t read the Bible.

David Barton is a conservative minister from Texas. He is the founder of Wallbuilders, an organization that seeks to destroy the separation of church and state to achieve its ultimate goal of turning America into a Christian state ruled by Biblical law. During his radio program called ‘Wallbuilders Live,’ Barton claimed that people are on welfare because they don’t read the Bible.





“Wouldn’t it be interesting to do a study between those that are on welfare and see how much and how often they read the Bible,” Barton wondered. “You know, if Booker T. Washington is right that Christianity and reading the Bible increases your desires and therefore your ability for hard work; if we take that as an axiom, does that mean that the people who are getting government assistance spend nearly no time in the Bible, therefore have no desire, and therefore no ability for hard work? I could go a lot of places with this. I would love to see this proven out in some kind of sociological study, but it makes perfect sense.”

There are two problems with Barton’s claim. First, Bible belt and the more religious/conservative states have been revealed as the real welfare states. On average, for every $1.00 that blue states receive, red states take $1.16. That may not sound like a lot but that adds up to millions more in federal aid going to conservative states.

If we take a look at the list of the top states that take federal dollars, 16 of the top twenty states are conservative leaning.

1. New Mexico: $2.03
2. Mississippi: $2.02
3. Alaska: $1.84
4. Louisiana: $1.78
5. West Virginia: $1.76
6. North Dakota: $1.68
7. Alabama: $1.66
8. South Dakota: $1.53
9. Kentucky: $1.51
10. Virginia: $1.51
11. Montana: $1.47
12. Hawaii: $1.44
13. Maine: $1.41
14. Arkansas: $1.41
15. Oklahoma: $1.36
16. South Carolina: $1.35
17. Missouri: $1.32
18. Maryland: $1.30
19. Tennessee: $1.27
20. Idaho: $1.21

As it turns out, the big liberal states that conservatives have come to despise actually take little federal aid.

40. Massachusetts: $0.82
42. New York: $0.79
43. California: $0.78

So the real welfare queens are in fact, conservatives.

The second problem with Barton’s claim is that a recent Gallup Poll found that Republicans are more religious than Democrats.

So either conservatives don’t read the Bible or they do read it and collect welfare at the same time. The evidence presented suggests that Bible-toting conservatives need welfare more than less religious people living in liberal states.

Regardless of who gets more welfare, those who get it most certainly need it. People just don’t go on welfare to get a free ride. In order to receive welfare benefits, a person has to qualify for them. Whether it be food stamps or Medicaid or housing assistance or energy assistance or unemployment benefits, welfare programs clearly help those in need. According to statistics, most welfare recipients are white adults and are on welfare less than two years at a time. That means the majority of Americans see welfare as temporary assistance.

Obviously, Barton’s claim is seriously flawed. Of course, I wouldn’t expect him or any other conservative for that matter to believe the facts.
:bang:



Note: full article quoted but the addictinginfo site is fine with that.

Quote:

Here are the copyright rules, regarding the reuse of content from this site;

You are free:
•to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
•to Remix — to adapt the work


Under the following conditions:
•Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
•Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.


With the understanding that:
•Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
•Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
•Other Rights — In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license: ◦Your fair dealing or fair use rights, or other applicable copyright exceptions and limitations;
◦The author’s moral rights;
◦Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such aspublicity or privacy rights.

•Notice — For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.